It's the weekend, so I'm finally able to do a little browsing on my regular news sites while the missus does a little sleeping in. I see that Time.com is claiming an "exclusive report" about a German court filing charges against Rumsfeld, Gonzalez, Tenet, and other Bush administration officials for "crimes against humanity."
Since I read about this very thing last weekend in
the ever-reliable The Nation magazine, I fail to see how Time.com can claim an exclusive. But I'm not going to pretend to understand journalism any more than I'm going to pretend that I understand the law.
But keep your eye on the legal phrase "universal jurisdiction." It is under this premise that the German court is filing its charges.
The Nation introduced me to this concept
back in October, as it relates to former Chilean dictatorship Augusto Pinochet and former Guatemalan president Efraín Ríos Montt.
It is through universal jurisdiction that domestic courts can prosecute criminals outside their own countries. (In that way, the words "universal jurisdiction" mean exactly what they say. Amazing how language can do that, even in the legal system.)
So you know that torture bill that President Bush just signed into law? There's a silver lining among the waterboarding and beatings. It appears that the unconscionable passing of the bill has become evidence itself in the German case against the Bush administration. Why does the US need to protect itself from war crimes prosecution if they're not committing war crimes?
While the sentences from these trials are hard to enforce, the possibility of prosecution is kept open. And let's face it: the political victory is in some ways as important as the actual prosecution. Half of the Bush administration will be seen by the world as the torturers they are.
I guess Germany has become (through experience?) experts on war crimes.
Labels: politics, shitbirds